Notes on the data: Psychological distress

Estimated population, aged 18 years and over, with high or very high psychological distress based on the Kessler 10 Scale (K10), 2014-15

 

Policy context:  Mental health is fundamental to the wellbeing of individuals, their families and the population as a whole. One indication of the mental health and wellbeing of a population is provided by measuring levels of psychological distress using the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale-10 items (K10). The K10 questionnaire was developed to yield a global measure of psychological distress, based on ten questions about people's level of nervousness, agitation, psychological fatigue and depression in the four weeks prior to interview, asked of respondents 18 years and over [1]. Based on previous research, a very high K10 score may indicate a need for professional help [2].

In 2014-15, 11.7% of Australians experienced 'high' or 'very high' levels of psychological distress, compared with 10.8% in 2011-12, 12.0% in 2007-08 and 12.6% in 2001. Proportionally more females than males experienced 'high' or 'very high' psychological distress in 2014-15 (13.5% and 9.9% respectively) [3].

References

  1. Coombs T. Australian Mental Health Outcomes and Classification Network: Kessler-10 Training Manual. Sydney: NSW Institute of Psychiatry; 2005.
  2. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). National health survey: users' guide - electronic publication, 2007-08. (ABS Cat. no. 4364.0). Canberra: ABS; 2009.
  3. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Psychological distress, National Health Survey: First results, 2014-15, from http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/4364.0.55.001; last accessed 4/12/2016.
 

Notes:  In the absence of data from administrative data sets, estimates are provided for selected health risk factors from the 2014–15 National Health Survey (NHS), conducted by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS).

Estimates at the Population Health Area (PHA) level are modelled estimates produced by the ABS, as described below (estimates at the Local Government Area (LGA) and Primary Health Network (PHN) level were derived from PHA estimates).

Estimates for Quintiles and Remoteness Areas are direct estimates, extracted using the ABS Survey TableBuilder.

Users of these modelled estimates should note that they do not represent data collected in administrative or other data sets. As such, they should be used with caution, and treated as indicative of the likely social dimensions present in an area with these demographic and socioeconomic characteristics.

The numbers are estimates for an area, not measured events as are, for example, death statistics. As such, they should be viewed as a tool that, when used in conjunction with local area knowledge and taking into consideration the prediction reliability, can provide useful information that can assist with decision making for small geographic regions. Of particular note is that the true value of the published estimates is also likely to vary within a range of values as shown by the upper and lower limits published in the data (xls) and viewable in the bar chart in the single map atlases.

What the modelled estimates do achieve, however, is to summarise the various demographic, socioeconomic and administrative information available for an area in a way that indicates the expected level of each health indicator for an area with those characteristics. In the absence of accurate, localised information about the health indicator, such predictions can usefully contribute to policy and program development, service planning and other decision-making processes that require an indication of the geographic distribution of the health indicator.

The survey response rate of around 85% provides a high level of coverage across the population; however, the response rate among some groups is lower than among others, e.g., those living in the most disadvantaged areas have a lower response rate than those living in less disadvantaged areas. Although the sample includes the majority of people living in households in private dwellings, it excludes those living in the most remote areas of Australia; whereas these areas comprise less than 3% of the total population, Aboriginal people comprise up to one third of the population in these areas. This and other limitations of the method mean that estimates have not been published for PHAs with populations under 1,000, or with a high proportion of their population in:

  1. non-private dwellings (hospitals, gaols, nursing homes - and also excludes members of the armed forces);
  2. in Very Remote areas;
  3. in discrete Aboriginal communities; and
  4. where the relative root mean square errors (RRMSEs) on the estimates was 1 or more (estimate replaced with ≠)

Notes:

  1. Estimates with RRMSEs from 0.25 and to 0.50 have been marked (~) to indicate that they should be used with caution; and those greater than 0.50 but less than 1 are marked (~~) to indicate that the estimate is considered too unreliable for general use.
  2. For the Primary Health Network (PHN) data, differences between the PHN totals and the sum of LGAs within PHNs result from the use of different concordances.

Indicator detail

Information was collected from respondents aged 18 years and over using the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale-10 (K10). This ten-item questionnaire yields a measure of psychological distress based on questions about negative emotional states (with different degrees of severity) experienced in the four weeks prior to interview. For each question, there is a five-level response scale based on the amount of time that a respondent experienced those particular feelings. The response options are 'none of the time'; 'a little of the time'; 'some of the time'; 'most of the time'; or 'all of the time'. Each of the items are scored from 1 for 'none' to 5 for 'all of the time'. Scores for the ten items are summed, yielding a minimum possible score of 10 and a maximum possible score of 50, with low scores indicating low levels of psychological distress and high scores indicating high levels of psychological distress.

K10 results are commonly grouped for output. Results from the 2014-15 NHS are grouped into the following four levels of psychological distress: 'low' (scores of 10-15, indicating little or no psychological distress); 'moderate' (scores of 16-21); 'high' (scores of 22-29); and 'very high' (scores of 30-50). Based on research from other population studies, a 'very high' level of psychological distress shown by the K10 may indicate a need for professional help. For the indicator in this atlas, data are for respondents aged 18 years and over who scored in the 'high' and 'very high' levels of psychological distress.

 

Numerator:  Estimated number of people aged 18 years and over assessed as having a high or very high level of psychological stress under the K10

 

Denominator:  Population aged 18 years and over

 

Detail of analysis:  Indirectly age-standardised rate per 100 population (aged 18 years and over); and/or indirectly age-standardised ratio, based on the Australian standard

 

Source:  

PHA, LGA & PHN: Compiled by PHIDU based on modelled estimates from the 2014-15 National Health Survey, ABS (unpublished).

Quintiles & Remoteness: Compiled by PHIDU based on direct estimates from the 2014-15 National Health Survey, ABS Survey TableBuilder.

 

© PHIDU This content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Australia licence.